A season, reviewed
What the AD actually put
in front of the board.
Illustrative composite drawn from a one-sport pilot — a girls' soccer programme with prior seasons of recurring lower-limb injury. This is what the review looked like at week 12.
Illustrative composite — not measured outcomes
Illustrative, drawn to match published secondary-school injury-surveillance and neuromuscular-warm-up research; ask us for the source pack.
The pattern across the season
Flags went up. Injuries went down.
The two lines are supposed to diverge. More athletes logging honestly means more gets caught early — which is exactly why fewer of those reports ever became a time-loss injury.
What changed the decision
Three things the AD could finally say.
“I went into that board meeting expecting to defend the budget line. I came out being asked which sport we add next.”
Athletic director · pilot programme
Composite pull-quote · pending approval
What happened next
Two more sports, the following season.
The pilot's own numbers were the pitch for expansion — no new sales conversation needed. That is the model: one concerning sport, one season, a review the board actually accepts, then the AD makes the case for the rest of the department on evidence they already have.
Better Athlete is a training-intelligence service, not a medical device. A read is a screening view of how training is landing — it does not diagnose, and it does not replace the judgement of your athletic trainer, school nurse, or physician.